Influence in the EU? Officials in hot water over BIG tobacco link

in the press

8655016552_9c6741cf92_z

europe callingThe role of big tobacco in shaping EU policies on smoking has long been suspect, with a commissioner being forced to resign two years ago and revelations about close links between retired commission officials and the industry. The UN convention on tobacco aims to “protect present and future generations from devastating health, social, environmental and economic consequences of tobacco consumption and exposure to tobacco smoke”. The ombudsman Emily O’Reilly said the convention which the EU signed, meant they should have limited their contacts with the industry and published details of any meetings they had. However, while the directorate responsible for health adhered to the rules, the rest of the commission argued it did not need to. It limited information to answering questions if asked, and if minutes had been kept.
20130529PHT10712_original“In absence of such a request or question, information is not forthcoming. Making a relevant access-to-documents request or posing a relevant MEP question, is likely to elicit the type of information sought only where such request or question is carefully worded. If no record of a meeting with a tobacco industry representative is kept (there is no requirement to keep such a record) then an access-to-documents request will be futile. Likewise, in the case of an MEP question, where no record has been kept, a full reply depends on whether the officials concerned are able to recall having had any such meetings and what was actually discussed” she said.
The ombudsman service examined commission files and staff agendas to identify possible meetings with tobacco lobbyists. They found officials from the commission’s legal service said they did not meet tobacco industry representatives, despite having met lawyers working for Philip Morris. The ombudsman said this appeared to result from a belief by those in the commission’s legal service that they did not have to register their contacts with lawyers.
“This has the effect of concealing meetings between commission staff and representatives of the tobacco industry. It also illustrated the danger of leaving it up to staff to decide whether to report a meeting and goes against the need for transparency” Read full article
View EU Commission not transparent enough about tobacco lobbying

EU-referendum

Ann Cahill (06 October 2015) EU officials in hot water over big tobacco link [online newspaper]. Retrieved from http://ow.ly/T44Rd

Advertisements

Drop Dr B' your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s